Website limitations foil free trade between Canada and U.S.
Interesting, isn’t it, how a little 5-digit code can clog up business transactions between countries?
I travel a lot on business and when my Canadian cell phone bills (about $1.50/minute, after roaming + long-distance charges) mounted, I thought I’d get myself a U.S. cell phone in Oregon. I went into the local Newberg super-grocer and asked to get a cell phone plan from a national company—in fact, the same company that is partial owner of my Canadian cell phone provider.
After the first half-hour task of figuring out whether a non-US resident could actually lease a U.S. cell phone, I was approved and paid the first and last month’s payments at the store. Because I’ve had dealings with U.S. companies before, I had pre-arranged with my client that I would rent a closet from her for $1/month so I would have an official U.S. address. (Technically, the address was for bills, though I opted for e-billing.) So far, so good.
The user experience soured when I tried to make my first monthly payment through the phone company’s site and then over the phone. Because my credit card has a Canadian postal code, it can’t be processed by the site or by the unfailingly cheerful customer service folks who answer their phones.
The zip code field can’t deal with anything other than five digits, and unlike other sites (for example, drugstore.com, where the customer service person cheerfully offered, “oh, for an address outside the US, you just choose Arizona and enter 99999 as the zip code”), this site needed the address to match my credit card address. So every month, I drive 35 minutes to the nearest Circuit City location where I pay my bill. Ironically, the Verison kiosk there processe my Canadian credit card without a hitch.
The assumption that consumers are within a particular geographic area is a sure way to alienate them. I’ve long resented the fact that I can’t use discount airfare sites such as PriceLine because I live a half-hour drive too far north. Their sites continue to come up in a market they don’t service; in fact, I often click their ad links as an outlet for the annoyance they cause. So when a company can’t be bothered to fix a broken technology for a legitimate market, that sends a powerful message about what they really think about getting business.
Popularity: 3% [?]
Comments
One Response to “Website limitations foil free trade between Canada and U.S.”
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- Technology won’t fix a bad strategy
- CMS Facts and Myths, and Why Process is So Important
- Skills to transition to content strategy
- Content strategy: The skills conundrum
- Abilities and aptitudes for a content strategist
- The extraordinary world of content strategists
- Dispelling More Content Myths
- Dispelling Myths about the Content Lifecycle
- Content Lifecycle
- Satisfying the cat: a user-centered design metaphor
Categories
Tags
accessibility ann rockley career development CMS content as asset content convergence content lifecycle content management content strategy convergence DITA Duo Consulting experience design Flash information architecture integration intelligent content interaction design management marketing mentors microformats open standards politics processes professional development ROI search section 508 services single-sourcing social media STC structured content syndication taxonomy TechCraft translation Twitter usability user-centered design user-generated content user experience value XMLPopular
- Using topic-based writing to meet aggressive deadlines
- Flash pages, skip intros, and other annoying content
- Content strategy and the new face of documentation
- Content strategy includes convergence, integration, and syndication
- Redefining content strategy
- A practical definition of content
- CMS selection practices need maturation
- The Content is Not in the Tool: Using Blogging, Microblogging, and Related Social Media Tools to Get Jobs and Influence People (or not)
- 5 Top Business Benefits of Content Re-Use
- Having community means growing community
Random Posts
- RT @gilbaneboston: If you are an #KM Pro, Our Survey for #IM is open til Friday- prizes for participation http://ow.ly/2Bkhx 7 hrs ago
- Shana Tova (Happy [Jewish] New Year). Services start at 6 PM sharp, and resume tomorrow morning. 7 hrs ago
- RT @trishalb: The Office version of #contentstrategy via Dilbert (Hat tip to @ashishguptaiitb: RT @dfarb) http://bit.ly/a91lo2 10 hrs ago
- London #contentstrategy call for speakers: Content Agility 2011 http://bit.ly/d6yVAQ 12 hrs ago
- More updates...









Latest Tweets
RSS feed
Twitter
I’ve had this problem a number of times myself, mostly with US based businesses and it’s tremendously frustrating. Do certain businesses feel the Canadian market is too small to be bothered with? If they need perspective on this, maybe we suggest that they cut California out of their US market. Why not? It has the same population as Canada. I know there are significant costs associated with doing international business, but we’re a ripe market, we’re willing to buy.